Post by buzz on Jul 27, 2006 13:17:00 GMT -5
Many people would have seen the programme "Born to Kill" on Prime TV this week. Isn't it amazing that they think because Ivan Milat was convicted by a court, he must be guilty, but they don't accept that the inverse is true, ie, that he was found NOT guilty of attacking and raping two girls he picked up hitch hiking while on the way to Goulburn so therefore he WASN'T guilty. The story about the hitch hikers is often used as an example to 'prove' that Ivan Milat was inclined to do these kinds of things.
In the programme you may have heard it said "The judge found him not guilty because the women changed their testimony." This is very significant. The first big lie in this case exposed.
Yes they did change their testimony. The whole incident did not happen the way they first said.
Several months ago one of these women went to visit Ivan's brother and sister in law. She went on her motorcycle. They got home from shopping to find a stranger in the yard. She gave Ivan's sister a hug and said she had come to APOLOGIZE for the trouble she and her former girlfriend had caused by their wrong testimony against Ivan Milat.
If she is reading this.....please, don't just visit, make an affidavit that will assist Ivan with his appeal. We can't make you do this but we hope you will, or at least tell someone your story. Ivan is in gaol for something he didn't do and you and Paul Onions are the only ones who can really help.
This is very significant indeed. Ivan is currently preparing a new 474 appeal. This time he is including all this new evidence including the DNA evidence which has cleared him. With his last attempt at a 474 he did not realize he could include new evidence.
Ivan has no legal representation and no computer. He is writing out his appeal by hand. His brother will make the required number of copies and put the appeal into five ring binders as required by law.
The second big lie was the identification of Ivan Milat by Paul Onions.
Paul Onions' report was handed in at Bowral Police Station and the woman who picked him up at Mittagong. Two police stations 'LOST' those original reports and description of the attacker. The fact that two police stations lost these reports, and as well, the diary page of the policewoman who took Paul Onions' complaint had that page missing, makes it very likely that these reports were lost deliberately. Paul Onions described a man 6 feet tall who looked nothing like Ivan Milat. Police showed him photos of Ivan Milat and he changed his description.
Paul Onions, if you are reading this, I ask you to get in touch with me. You can send an email through the site. You need to speak with the other man who was picked up while hitch hiking in that same area and who had a terrifying experience. He, too, described a man 6 feet tall who spoke about the same subjects as your attacker. His story is here:
www.resist.com.au/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=3120
If you are willing to speak up, Mr Onions, as one of the women involved in the earlier alleged 'attack' has, Ivan Milat would very much appreciate your honesty in explaining how you came to change the description.
Coming soon : The second backpacker murders suspect: there were witnesses to his crimes yet he was never arrested. Interviews with three witnesses. His DNA must be compared with that found in Belanglo. Information about this suspect has never been made public. The witnesses are risking their lives by telling their story.
In the programme you may have heard it said "The judge found him not guilty because the women changed their testimony." This is very significant. The first big lie in this case exposed.
Yes they did change their testimony. The whole incident did not happen the way they first said.
Several months ago one of these women went to visit Ivan's brother and sister in law. She went on her motorcycle. They got home from shopping to find a stranger in the yard. She gave Ivan's sister a hug and said she had come to APOLOGIZE for the trouble she and her former girlfriend had caused by their wrong testimony against Ivan Milat.
If she is reading this.....please, don't just visit, make an affidavit that will assist Ivan with his appeal. We can't make you do this but we hope you will, or at least tell someone your story. Ivan is in gaol for something he didn't do and you and Paul Onions are the only ones who can really help.
This is very significant indeed. Ivan is currently preparing a new 474 appeal. This time he is including all this new evidence including the DNA evidence which has cleared him. With his last attempt at a 474 he did not realize he could include new evidence.
Ivan has no legal representation and no computer. He is writing out his appeal by hand. His brother will make the required number of copies and put the appeal into five ring binders as required by law.
The second big lie was the identification of Ivan Milat by Paul Onions.
Paul Onions' report was handed in at Bowral Police Station and the woman who picked him up at Mittagong. Two police stations 'LOST' those original reports and description of the attacker. The fact that two police stations lost these reports, and as well, the diary page of the policewoman who took Paul Onions' complaint had that page missing, makes it very likely that these reports were lost deliberately. Paul Onions described a man 6 feet tall who looked nothing like Ivan Milat. Police showed him photos of Ivan Milat and he changed his description.
Paul Onions, if you are reading this, I ask you to get in touch with me. You can send an email through the site. You need to speak with the other man who was picked up while hitch hiking in that same area and who had a terrifying experience. He, too, described a man 6 feet tall who spoke about the same subjects as your attacker. His story is here:
www.resist.com.au/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=3120
If you are willing to speak up, Mr Onions, as one of the women involved in the earlier alleged 'attack' has, Ivan Milat would very much appreciate your honesty in explaining how you came to change the description.
Coming soon : The second backpacker murders suspect: there were witnesses to his crimes yet he was never arrested. Interviews with three witnesses. His DNA must be compared with that found in Belanglo. Information about this suspect has never been made public. The witnesses are risking their lives by telling their story.