The future of US gun laws - When it comes to anti-gun fanatics, Peters is the worst of the worst. Unlike most gun grabbers, she doesn't dispute the effectiveness of armed self defense. Rather, she denies it exists.
According to her, there is no such thing as legitimate armed self-defense. Any firearms use other then hunting is considered a "gun crime". Anyone who buys a gun for self-defense is "planning to kill someone".
Peters and her ilk must never be allowed to influence our firearms policy.
Peters: "In other countries people have much more confidence in their goverments".
Ah yes, governments in Sudan, Rwanda, China, North Korea, and Cuba have proven how well founded the trust really is (Also those countries have strict gun laws).
Peters obviously needs to be reminded that governments are resposible for the majority of deaths around the world, not armed citizens. Furthermore, it was distrust of the government that led the creation of America as a nation in the fist place. MIT1369 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide 0 Poor comment Good comment Marked as spam Reply I wouldn't expect anything less from this silly woman. She keeps talking as if all guns were destroyed that crime would be a thing of the past. What total rot! It's typical of the type of anti western broadcasting we've come to expect from aljazeera.